APAC Web3 X Strategy: Korea, Japan, India Are Not the Same
Running one English X account and auto-translating it for Asia is not a content strategy. It is a signal that you have not done the work. I have run APAC campaigns from Korea to India to Vietnam, first as APAC Lead at CoinMarketCap, now leading APAC PR at Myosin, and the single most reliable predictor of failure in each market is treating the region as a single audience.
APAC is not one market. The X behaviours across Korea, Japan, and India are different enough that what earns credibility in Seoul actively hurts you in Tokyo, and what moves the builder community in Bangalore has no overlap with the retail crowd in Mumbai. This post breaks down how each community actually behaves on X, what kinds of content earn trust, and what your account structure should look like if you are serious about each market.
---
I said it bluntly on X a couple of years ago, and it still holds:
one of the biggest mistakes marketers make is using the same marketing gimmicks or strategies while trying to penetrate in different markets (demographically). different markets have different needs as well as price points. what might seem like value to a particular market, can be norm for another market.
Shilika Jain on X, 11 Aug 2023
That post was about regional marketing broadly. On X specifically, the misalignment is sharper because the platform is visible. Every post you get wrong is public evidence that you do not understand the room.
Korea: X is the reference layer, not the primary community
The Korean crypto ecosystem is a retail trading machine. Upbit handles roughly 70 percent of KRW volume and more than 16 million accounts sit across licensed exchanges.

