PLAYBOOKAll posts

Behind the Scenes Content Ideas for Web3 Startups (and Limits)

Behind the scenes content ideas for Web3 startups that build your story between launches, plus a three-zone sort for what to post, delay or keep private.

Shilika Jain in a pink satin shirt standing in a wood-panelled lounge with framed posters
On this page12
  1. Why does behind-the-scenes content matter between launches?
  2. Behind the scenes content ideas that work for Web3 teams
  3. The Glass Wall Sort: what to post, delay or keep private
  4. How do you stay honest without oversharing?
  5. How often should a startup post behind-the-scenes content?
  6. How does process content set up the next announcement?
  7. When behind-the-scenes content doesn't fit
  8. FAQ
  9. Should behind-the-scenes posts come from the founder or the brand account?
  10. Can I share a partner's name before the partnership is announced?
  11. What if a behind-the-scenes post gets negative replies?
  12. Do behind-the-scenes posts help with press coverage?

The best behind-the-scenes content for a startup shows how you make decisions, not what you're about to announce. Think decision notes, the thing that broke and how you fixed it, what users told you last week, the rejected designs, and the number you're watching. In Web3 you also need a hard line around anything market-moving or security-related, so I sort every idea into three zones before it goes out: post now, post later, never post.

That sorting step is what most teams skip. They either share nothing between launches, so the feed goes silent for six weeks, or they share everything and leak a partner name or a token detail they shouldn't have.

Why does behind-the-scenes content matter between launches?

Because announcements are spikes and the gaps between them are where people decide whether they still care.

If the only time your community hears from you is when something ships, every launch has to rebuild attention from zero. Process content keeps the story moving in the weeks when there's no news. When the next launch lands, people already know the problem you were working on, which trade-off you agonised over and who on the team built it. The announcement becomes the payoff of a story they've been following, not a cold open.

This is also where I've been practising what I preach. When I started my public marketing teardowns this year, the point was to work in the open:

it's always about developers buidl'ing in public, now it's about marketers building in public!! Shilika Jain on X, 1 Jun 2026

Developers in crypto have shipped in public for years: open repos, testnet updates, governance forums. Marketing and leadership teams rarely do the same, and that's the gap behind-the-scenes content fills.

Behind the scenes content ideas that work for Web3 teams

These are the formats I suggest to founders, grouped by where they come from. None of them needs a launch to justify it.

From the product side

  1. The decision note. Two options you considered, which you picked and the one reason why. Short, specific, signed by the person who made the call.
  2. The thing that broke. A testnet bug, a failed migration, an indexer that fell over. What happened, what you changed, what users should expect now.
  3. The rejected version. Old wireframes, the onboarding flow you threw out, the first logo. People love seeing the path not taken.
  4. The number you're watching. Not a vanity metric. The one figure the team checks every morning and why it matters to the thesis.

From the people side

  1. The engineer explainer. A two-minute clip of whoever built a feature explaining the hard part in plain words.
  2. The user call takeaway. One sentence a user said that changed your roadmap, shared with permission and without identifying them.
  3. The ritual. How you run a release day, a post-mortem or a community call. Teams outside crypto find this fascinating, and so do hires.

From the market side

  1. The bet. What you think the category gets wrong, and what you're building because of it.
  2. The event debrief. What you heard on the floor at a conference that you didn't expect.
  3. The reading list. The governance proposal, paper or thread that shaped a design choice, with a line on why.

If you want the general post templates (weekly shipped logs, mistake posts, monthly recaps), my build in public playbook covers those. This post is about the Web3-specific question underneath: what's safe to show.

The Glass Wall Sort: what to post, delay or keep private

Every behind-the-scenes idea goes through one sort before anyone drafts it. I call it the Glass Wall Sort, because the goal is a wall people can see through without being able to walk through it.

ZoneWhat belongs hereRule of thumbExamples
Clear glass: post nowProcess, reasoning, culture, public metricsIt's already true and harms no one if a competitor reads itDecision notes, rituals, rejected designs, on-chain numbers anyone can query
Frosted glass: post laterAnything tied to a dated event or a third partyShare after the event, or after the other party signs offPartner work, audit progress, exchange conversations, hiring for an unannounced product
Brick: never postSecurity, token-sensitive and personal dataIf it could move a price, help an attacker or expose a person, it stays insideUnpatched vulnerabilities, unannounced listings, treasury moves, unreleased tokenomics, user wallet addresses

Three tests decide the zone:

  • The price test. If this post could move a token price or front-run an announcement, it's brick until the announcement is out.
  • The attacker test. If it describes a weakness that isn't fixed yet, brick. Once the fix ships and the audit is public, the story of finding it can move to clear glass.
  • The partner test. If it names or hints at someone who hasn't agreed to be named, frosted at best.

Most content lives in the clear zone, which surprises founders who assume behind the scenes means revealing secrets. It doesn't. The interesting part of how you work is almost never the confidential part.

How do you stay honest without oversharing?

Transparency in crypto isn't optional. People can read your contracts and your treasury wallets, and they will. When I listed what makes client relationships work, the last line was the one I'd apply to any community:

honest & transparent communication at the apex! Shilika Jain on X, 7 Aug 2023

Transparency is about decisions, not documents. You can be open about why you delayed a feature without publishing the internal Slack thread. You can admit a migration went badly without naming the engineer who pushed it.

A few habits keep it on the right side:

  • Share the reasoning, not the raw material. Summaries beat screenshots of internal tools.
  • Talk about mistakes once they're fixed, with what changed. An open wound invites pile-ons.
  • Never put individual users on display. Aggregate, anonymise, or ask.
  • Keep founders' personal finances and token holdings out of the process feed entirely.

When a crisis hits, process content is not the place to manage it. That needs its own plan and a different voice.

How often should a startup post behind-the-scenes content?

Little and often beats big and rare. Two pieces a week is enough for most early teams: one from the product side, one from the people or market side. The bigger risk is starting strong and disappearing.

showing up every single fkn day is the moat in the journey of building a personal brand. Shilika Jain on X, 5 Aug 2025

I said that about personal brands, and it holds for company feeds too. What I set up with teams is a simple rotation so no single person carries it:

WeekProduct voicePeople or market voice
1Decision note from the founderEngineer explainer clip
2The number you're watchingEvent debrief or reading list
3The thing that brokeUser call takeaway
4Rejected versionThe bet, written by the founder

Four weeks, eight pieces, five or six people contributing. Feed the raw material into a shared doc as it happens; my sibling post on a story bank template shows how to keep that doc alive.

Where it goes matters less than you'd think. Founders' process notes tend to land better on personal accounts than on the brand handle, because people follow people. The brand account can quote or reshare. If you're unsure which platform suits which format, the LinkedIn vs X content system breaks that down.

How does process content set up the next announcement?

This is the part that ties back to narrating instead of announcing. Behind-the-scenes posts are chapters. The launch is the chapter everyone was waiting for.

Here's a worked example of how that plays out over six weeks for a wallet team shipping a new recovery feature:

  1. Week 1: The founder posts the bet. Seed phrases are the main reason people never move off exchanges.
  2. Week 2: A decision note. Why the team chose one recovery method over another, and the trade-off they accepted.
  3. Week 3: The thing that broke. Testnet recovery failed on one device type, and here's the fix.
  4. Week 4: The user call takeaway. A tester said, in effect, "I'd finally move my funds off the exchange if this works."
  5. Week 5: Frosted glass becomes clear. The audit is complete, so the team shares what the auditors focused on.
  6. Week 6: Launch. The announcement post links back to weeks 1 to 4, and the press pitch leads with the problem the community already knows about.

By launch day, a reporter who looks at the feed sees six weeks of context. That's a different conversation from a cold press release. I unpacked how the same "bigger idea" thinking applies to a real wallet brand in my Tangem teardown.

When behind-the-scenes content doesn't fit

It's not right for every team or every moment.

  • Stealth periods. If you're pre-announcement on a raise or a token, the clear zone shrinks to almost nothing. Post about the category, not the company.
  • Regulated phases. Around a listing or a vesting cliff, legal may want a quiet period. Respect it, and plan the content for after.
  • Teams with no one who wants to show their face. Forced authenticity reads as forced. Use written decision notes and diagrams instead of video.
  • Very early with nothing working yet. You can share the bet and the reading list, but a feed full of "still building" posts with no progress starts to hurt.

The cost is real too. Somebody has to own the calendar, chase contributors and run the Glass Wall Sort, which takes a few hours a week. If that's the hour you'd otherwise spend talking to users, talk to users. Then post about what they said.

For founders who want their own voice to carry the process content, that's the work I do in founder profiling: picking the themes, drafting with you, and making sure the feed is building toward something.

FAQ

Should behind-the-scenes posts come from the founder or the brand account?

Mostly the founder and the team, with the brand account resharing. Personal accounts get more trust and reach for process content because people relate to a person making a decision. Keep the brand account for announcements, product docs and resharing the best team posts.

Can I share a partner's name before the partnership is announced?

No, not without their written sign-off on timing and wording. Even hinting ("big integration coming with a top-10 chain") can break an embargo or annoy a partner's own comms team. Hold it in the frosted zone until both sides publish.

What if a behind-the-scenes post gets negative replies?

Answer the fair points in the thread and leave trolls alone. If several people raise the same concern, that's useful signal and probably your next decision note. Don't delete critical replies unless they're abuse or scams.

Do behind-the-scenes posts help with press coverage?

Indirectly. Reporters rarely cover a process post on its own, but they check your feed before writing about you. A visible trail of decisions and progress makes your announcement easier to believe and gives them context to quote.

Want a second pair of eyes on what your team should show and what it should hold back? Book a 30-minute call and we'll run your next month through the Glass Wall Sort.

Shilika Jain smiling mid-talk on stage, microphone in hand

Work with Shilika

Book a 30-min intro call.

I come prepped with a teardown of your current press footprint.

Keep reading

Similar playbooks

01

Build in Public: A Playbook for Founders Who Hate Self-Promotion

A build in public playbook for founders who hate self-promotion: what to share and keep private, cadence, platforms, risks, and 10 ready-to-use post templates.

Read playbook
02

LinkedIn vs X for Web3 Founders: Run Both Without Burning Out

X rewards hot takes and LinkedIn rewards depth, and cross-posting tanks both. The split system Web3 founders use to feed both platforms from one source.

Read playbook
03

Tangem Marketing Teardown: Sell Ownership, Not Hardware

My marketing teardown of Tangem: why its real competitor is centralized exchanges, and the campaign ideas I would run to sell ownership, not hardware.

Read playbook
All playbooks