On this page12
- Why does PR take months rather than weeks?
- What happens in each of the first six months?
- What does a real six-month cadence look like?
- What are the early signals that PR is working?
- What speeds PR up, and what slows it down?
- Can PR work faster than three months?
- When does a slow start mean something is wrong?
- FAQ
- Is a three-month PR contract long enough?
- Does PR work faster in a bull market?
- How long until AI assistants start mentioning my company?
- Should I pause PR when I have no news?
Earned PR usually takes three to six months to show results you can feel, and the first month is mostly preparation, not coverage. With real news in hand, you can land a first story within four to eight weeks. But the effects founders actually want, like inbound interview requests, a recognisable name in your category and journalists who reply, tend to arrive somewhere between month three and month six of steady work.
That's the honest answer. It's not what most founders want to hear in the first call, so I'd rather show what each month actually looks like and what you should be checking along the way.
Why does PR take months rather than weeks?
Because almost every input is controlled by someone else's calendar. A reporter needs a reason to write, an editor needs space, and a news cycle needs to be quiet enough for your story to fit. Relationships with journalists also build in layers. The first pitch to a reporter is an introduction. The third or fourth, if each one was useful, is when they start replying quickly.
PR works when you have a long term approach, work on building relationships, carving out the brand, sharing your story, ongoing convos w journos Shilika Jain on X, 26 Jul 2023
There's also the founder side. Before anyone pitches, the narrative needs to be sharp, spokespeople need to be ready and someone has to agree on approvals. Skipping that work doesn't save time. It just means the first pitches go out weak.
What happens in each of the first six months?
This is the map I walk founders through at kickoff. Every company moves a little differently, but the shape holds for most Web3 and AI startups with a reasonable news pipeline.
| Month | What the work looks like | What you should see | Red flag if |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Narrative, messaging, spokesperson prep, media list, news calendar, first commentary pitches | An agreed one-page narrative and a 90-day news calendar | Pitching starts before anyone has agreed the story |
| 2 | First news pitch, expert commentary, newsjacking attempts, podcast outreach | One or two pieces of coverage or commentary, early podcast bookings | Nothing has gone out because approvals are stuck |
| 3 | Second news moment, first op-ed, follow-ups with reporters who engaged | A few reporters now recognise the name, first founder interview | Every pitch is a press release, no angles |
| 4 | Data or thought leadership piece, regional pitching if relevant | First inbound request from a journalist or podcast | You're still the only source of your own story |
| 5 | Larger announcement with embargoed outreach, more interviews | A cluster of coverage around one moment, rising branded search | Coverage is scattered across unrelated angles |
| 6 | Review, refine narrative, plan the next two quarters | A visible body of coverage that sales, hiring and fundraising teams use | Nobody can say what the coverage is for |
If you have a funding round or a mainnet launch early, months two and five can swap. The point of the table is the sequence: preparation, first proof, relationships, then compounding.
What does a real six-month cadence look like?
The clearest example from my own client work is GAIA, a decentralised AI company, where I ran founder-led visibility for CEO Matt Wright and co-founder and COO Shashank Sripada from December 2024 to April 2025.
Over those five months the work included a Forbes piece on AI agents in December, a Decrypt feature on GAIA's "living knowledge systems" in January, a Benzinga piece on decentralised AI roadblocks in February, a CryptoDaily UK interview with Shashank around Consensus Hong Kong in March, and coverage of GAIA passing 400,000 nodes in April. Around that ran a steady stream of podcasts and video interviews, including Rug Radio, Web3 with Sam Kamani and The Boss Code.
What I want founders to notice is the rhythm, not the logos. Something credible happened almost every month, all of it built around one narrative, decentralised AI agents with node count as proof. That consistency is what compounds. The longer write-up is on the GAIA case study.
What are the early signals that PR is working?
Placements are the obvious measure, but in months one to three they're a lagging one. These leading signals show up earlier and tell you more about whether the programme is on track:
- Reporter replies. Even a "not for us, but keep me posted" is progress. Silence across a full list after two news moments is a problem.
- Speed of founder approvals. If quotes and drafts come back within a day or two, you'll catch news cycles. If they take a week, you'll miss them.
- Podcast and panel invitations. These often arrive before tier-1 coverage, and they compound.
- Message pull-through. Are reporters using your framing, or describing you in their own generic words.
- Branded search and AI answers. Check what Google and AI assistants say about you at the start and again at month three.
- Internal use. Your sales, hiring or fundraising leads start asking for links. That's when coverage becomes an asset rather than an announcement.
for those who think PR is easy, it’s so hard to get journalist’s attention Shilika Jain on X, 7 Jan 2025
Getting attention is slow. That's why the early signals matter: they tell you attention is building before the big stories arrive. For a deeper look at reporting these to a board, the Web3 PR metrics dashboard lays out a format.
What speeds PR up, and what slows it down?
Founders have more control over the timeline than they think. In my experience, these are the levers that matter most.
Things that speed it up:
- A real news pipeline: a raise, a launch, a meaningful partnership or proprietary data at least every six to eight weeks.
- A founder who'll do interviews, podcasts and commentary at short notice.
- A single, clear thesis the founder can defend. I wrote about choosing one in how to pick your one thesis.
- A 24 to 48 hour turnaround on approvals.
- Willingness to comment on other people's news, not just your own.
Things that slow it down:
- Waiting for the "big announcement" before doing anything.
- Legal or investor sign-off on every sentence.
- Changing the narrative every month.
- Expecting tier-1 outlets first, before any trade coverage or founder profile exists.
- Treating paid placements as a shortcut. They don't build relationships with reporters.
Can PR work faster than three months?
Sometimes, for a single story. If you have strong news, like a sizeable funding round with credible investors or a launch with a sharp angle, a focused embargo campaign can land good coverage within a few weeks of kickoff. A launch sequence I've shared on X runs thought leadership one to two months ahead, podcasts a month ahead, an AMA two weeks out and embargoed outreach the week before.
But a fast single story isn't the same as PR "working". One article fades from the homepage in a day. The things that make PR worth paying for, like recognition, trust and inbound, take repetition.
It's one of the lessons I wrote down after four years in crypto.
humility & patience is everything Shilika Jain on X, 29 Apr 2023
Patience isn't passivity. It means doing the steady work every month, even when the month doesn't produce a headline.
When does a slow start mean something is wrong?
Three months with nothing at all is worth a hard conversation. Not every quiet month is a failure, but a few patterns tell you the programme itself has a problem rather than the market:
- No pitches have gone out because the narrative is still being debated.
- Every pitch is a press release, with no angle, data or founder view attached.
- There's no news on the calendar for the next quarter.
- Your PR lead can't tell you which reporters engaged and what they said.
If two or more of those are true, the timeline isn't the issue. Fix the inputs first. If you're deciding whether you need senior help to do that, when to hire fractional PR is a good starting point, and my Web3 PR campaign service is structured around exactly this six-month arc.
FAQ
Is a three-month PR contract long enough?
It's enough to test fit and land early coverage, but usually not enough to see the compounding effects. Three months gets you through preparation and the first news moments. I'd treat it as a pilot with clear leading signals, and plan the budget assuming you'll continue for at least another quarter if those signals are positive.
Does PR work faster in a bull market?
Attention is easier to get when the market is busy, but competition for coverage is higher too. Bear markets often have quieter news cycles and more room for substantive stories. The timeline difference is smaller than founders expect, and the quality of your news matters more than the market phase.
How long until AI assistants start mentioning my company?
It depends on how much independent coverage exists and how often it's refreshed. Assistants tend to cite the same outlets PR targets, so a steady body of articles and interviews over several months is what moves this. Check your baseline at kickoff so you can compare honestly later.
Should I pause PR when I have no news?
No. Quiet months are when commentary, op-eds, podcasts and data pieces do their work. Pausing resets the reporter relationships you've built, and restarting costs you the first month again.
Wondering whether your PR is on track or just slow? Book a 30-minute teardown and I'll walk your last three months against this map.


