On this page16
- What industry analysts actually do
- When analyst relations matters for a startup (and when it doesn't)
- Briefing vs inquiry: the distinction that saves you money
- How Gartner Cool Vendors, Magic Quadrants and Forrester Waves work (the basics)
- Gartner Cool Vendors
- Gartner Magic Quadrant
- Forrester Wave and Forrester landscape reports
- IDC MarketScape
- The smaller analyst firms worth briefing first
- How to run your first analyst briefing (template included)
- Before the briefing
- The request email
- After the briefing
- What analyst relations costs: DIY, fractional and agency
- How AR and PR reinforce each other
- Common analyst relations mistakes startups make
Analyst Relations 101: Gartner, Forrester and IDC for Startups
Analyst relations (AR) is the work of making sure the industry analysts who advise enterprise buyers know your company exists, understand what it does, and describe it accurately when a buyer asks. For most startups, AR matters only once you sell to large enterprises with formal procurement, usually around Series A or later. Before that, a handful of free vendor briefings with the right analysts at Gartner, Forrester, IDC and a few smaller firms is enough. You don't need a paid subscription to brief an analyst, and you can't buy your way into a Magic Quadrant or a Wave.
That's the short version. The rest of this post is the operator version: what analysts actually do, the difference between a briefing and an inquiry, how the big reports work at a high level, which smaller firms punch above their weight, and what AR costs if you run it yourself versus with help.
I run PR for Web3, AI and cybersecurity founders, and AR comes up most in security and enterprise AI. Security buyers lean on analysts harder than almost any other category, which is why I treat AR as a standard line item on cybersecurity PR engagements and an optional one everywhere else.
What industry analysts actually do
Analysts sit between vendors and buyers. Their firms sell research subscriptions mostly to enterprise end users: CIOs, CISOs, heads of data, procurement teams. Those clients pay for two things: published research, and the right to call an analyst and ask, "We're shortlisting vendors for X. Who should we look at?"
That second part is the one startups underestimate. A large share of analyst influence happens in private calls you will never see. If an analyst has never heard of you, you aren't on the shortlist they read out. If they heard about you two years ago and you've since pivoted, they'll describe the old company.
Analysts also write market reports that rank or map vendors, publish guides on emerging categories, and speak at their firms' conferences. Journalists quote them. Investors sometimes call them during diligence.
What analysts don't do: cover your funding round, run your launch, or act as a marketing channel. They're closer to a reference librarian for enterprise buyers than to a reporter.
When analyst relations matters for a startup (and when it doesn't)
AR earns its time when three things are true at once. You sell to enterprises that run formal vendor evaluations. Your buyers are the kind of people who hold analyst subscriptions. And your category is either already recognised by analysts or close enough that they're starting to write about it.
Use this table to place yourself.
| Your situation | AR priority | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-seed or seed, selling to developers or SMBs | Low | Skip AR. Put the time into press, content and product |
| Seed, first enterprise pilots, buyers mention analysts | Medium | Run 3 to 5 free briefings a year, keep a one-page fact sheet current |
| Series A, enterprise pipeline, competitors appear in analyst reports | High | Build a briefing calendar, track analyst coverage, prepare for report inclusion |
| Series B and up, regulated or security buyers | Very high | Consider a subscription, a dedicated AR owner, and formal report submissions |
| Consumer, crypto-native, or developer-only product | Usually low | Developer-focused firms like RedMonk may matter more than the big three |
A quick signal test: ask your last five enterprise prospects whether they used analyst research to build their shortlist. If two or more say yes, AR belongs in your plan this year.
Briefing vs inquiry: the distinction that saves you money
Most founder confusion about AR comes from mixing up these two.
A briefing is you telling the analyst about your company. Vendors can generally request briefings from the major firms without being paying clients. You present your product, customers, roadmap and point of view; the analyst asks questions. It's one-directional by design. Briefings are how analysts stay current on vendors, so most firms make them available to non-clients, though acceptance depends on whether your company fits an analyst's coverage area.
An inquiry is the reverse: you ask the analyst for advice. "How do buyers in this space evaluate vendors?" "Is our positioning landing?" "What do you hear about our competitor?" Inquiry access is a paid client benefit. That's what you buy when you buy a subscription.
| Briefing | Inquiry | |
|---|---|---|
| Direction | You inform the analyst | The analyst advises you |
| Cost | Usually free to request | Requires a paid subscription |
| Typical length | 30 to 60 minutes | 30 minutes, often scheduled within days |
| Best for | Getting on the radar, correcting stale info | Feedback on positioning, market sizing, competitive perspective |
| What you should not expect | Free advice or a promise of coverage | Influence over published rankings |
For a seed or Series A startup, briefings alone usually cover 80% of the value. Buy inquiry access later, when the feedback is worth more to you than what it costs.
How Gartner Cool Vendors, Magic Quadrants and Forrester Waves work (the basics)
I'll describe these carefully, because the details change and each firm publishes its own methodology. Read the current version on the firm's site before you plan around any of them.
Gartner Cool Vendors
Cool Vendors reports highlight a small number of newer or smaller companies doing something interesting in a specific area. They're one of the few big-firm reports realistically within reach of an early-stage startup. Gartner states that vendors don't have to be clients to be selected. The path in is simple and slow: brief the analysts who cover your space, consistently, and show something genuinely novel.
Gartner Magic Quadrant
A Magic Quadrant evaluates established vendors in a defined market against two axes, roughly ability to execute and completeness of vision. Inclusion criteria typically include thresholds such as revenue, customer count or geographic presence. Most seed and Series A companies won't meet them yet. That's fine. The work you do now (briefings, a clear category story) is what positions you for inclusion later.
Forrester Wave and Forrester landscape reports
A Forrester Wave scores a set of vendors in a market against published criteria, again with inclusion thresholds. Forrester also publishes broader landscape-style reports that list many vendors in a space with less evaluation depth, and those are more accessible to younger companies.
IDC MarketScape
IDC's MarketScape is its vendor-assessment format, mapping vendors on capabilities and strategy. IDC also publishes market sizing and forecast data that journalists and investors cite heavily, so an IDC briefing can pay off in places you won't see directly.
The rule across all of them: you cannot pay for placement. Subscriptions buy access and advice, not position. Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something.
The smaller analyst firms worth briefing first
The big three get the attention, but for a startup the smaller firms often deliver more per hour. Their analysts take briefings more readily, their reports are more likely to include early companies, and their clients are frequently the exact niche buyers you want.
- RedMonk: developer-focused; strong if your buyer is engineers and adoption is bottom-up.
- KuppingerCole: identity, access and security; respected by European security buyers.
- Omdia: broad technology and security coverage with strong telecom and enterprise reach.
- GigaOm: publishes vendor-comparison reports across infrastructure, data and security categories.
- Constellation Research: enterprise technology and emerging categories, with a focus on business-buyer perspective.
- 451 Research (S&P Global Market Intelligence): strong on emerging enterprise tech and frequently tracks startups and funding.
- Independent analysts: solo or boutique analysts who left large firms often still advise buyers in a narrow niche.
Some smaller firms run paid programmes alongside their research. Read the terms. A sponsored report should be labelled as sponsored, and you should know which kind you're buying before you quote it in a sales deck.
How to run your first analyst briefing (template included)
A good first briefing is 45 minutes, about 20 of which is you talking. Analysts brief dozens of vendors a month. The ones they remember come in with a clear category claim, real customer evidence, and a point of view on where the market is going.
Before the briefing
- Confirm the analyst actually covers your category (read two or three of their recent reports or abstracts)
- Prepare a 10 to 12 slide deck: problem, market view, product, architecture, customers, pricing model, roadmap, competitive frame
- Write a one-page fact sheet: founding date, HQ, headcount, funding, customer count range, named customers you can share, pricing approach
- Bring one customer story with specifics you're allowed to share
- Decide what's under NDA and say so at the start
- Pick one spokesperson for the narrative and one for technical depth
The request email
Subject: Briefing request: [Company], [category] for [buyer]
Hi [Analyst name],
I lead [role] at [Company]. We build [one-sentence description] for [buyer], and we're seeing [specific trend] across our customers.
I've read your recent work on [report or topic] and think our approach to [specific problem] is relevant to it.
Could we book a 45-minute vendor briefing in the next few weeks? I'll send a short deck and a one-page fact sheet in advance.
Thanks,
[Name]
[Title, Company, link]
After the briefing
Send a thank-you with the deck, the fact sheet and any follow-up answers within 48 hours. Log what they asked about; their questions tell you what buyers are asking them. Set a reminder to brief again in six to nine months, or sooner if you ship something material.
What analyst relations costs: DIY, fractional and agency
There are three cost lines in AR: your time, research subscriptions, and outside help.
| Approach | Typical cost | What you get | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIY briefings only | Founder or PMM time, roughly 4 to 8 hours per briefing including prep | Radar presence with the right analysts | Seed to early Series A |
| Subscription to one major firm | Often five figures per year per seat, varies widely by firm and package | Inquiry access, research library | Series A and up with enterprise pipeline |
| AR inside a fractional PR retainer | Part of a $5K to $12K per month retainer | Briefing calendar, prep, follow-up, alignment with press | Series A security and enterprise AI teams |
| Dedicated AR agency | Usually a separate monthly retainer on top of PR | Full programme, report submissions, inquiry strategy | Series B and up in analyst-heavy categories |
Those subscription figures are approximate and negotiated case by case, so get a quote. For context on the agency side, the median Series B cybersecurity agency retainer sits near $23,500 a month, and AR is often a bolt-on to that.
If you're in security specifically, my cybersecurity analyst relations page covers how I run AR alongside press, and the cybersecurity analyst relations playbook goes deeper on the security analyst landscape.
How AR and PR reinforce each other
AR and PR are different disciplines with one shared asset: your narrative. When they're run separately, startups end up telling analysts one story and reporters another. Analysts read the trade press. Reporters quote analysts. Inconsistency gets noticed.
The workflow I use is simple. Brief analysts before a major launch, under NDA, so they hear it from you first. Then, when the news goes public, reporters who call those analysts for comment get an informed answer instead of "I haven't seen it." That's also why a well-briefed analyst quote in a trade press piece is worth more than another vendor quote.
Three habits that make AR and PR compound:
- Keep one fact sheet that both your press kit and your analyst deck draw from.
- Brief analysts 2 to 4 weeks before any embargoed press announcement.
- Share notable coverage with the analysts who cover you, briefly, once a quarter.
Common analyst relations mistakes startups make
- Treating a briefing like a sales demo. Analysts want market view and evidence, not feature walk-throughs.
- Briefing the wrong analyst. Coverage areas are narrow; read their work first.
- Only showing up when you want something, like a report inclusion.
- Overclaiming customer counts or revenue. Analysts compare notes with buyers and with your competitors' briefings.
- Assuming a subscription buys placement. It doesn't, and saying so in public damages trust with the analyst.
- Letting the relationship lapse after one briefing. Twice a year is the minimum to stay current.
AR is slow, unglamorous, and invisible right up until an enterprise buyer tells you an analyst recommended you. Start with three briefings, a clean fact sheet and a calendar reminder. That's more than most of your competitors are doing.
Selling into security or enterprise AI and not sure if AR belongs in your plan yet? Book a 30-minute teardown and we'll map it against your pipeline.

